Sandeep Reddy Vanga claims filmmaking is tougher than cracking IAS as he responds to Vikas Divyakirti’s ‘Animal’ criticism
Filmmaker’s feisty response to IAS officer’s scathing review
In a candid chat with Neelesh Misra on his popular podcast, Game Changers, filmmaker Sandeep Reddy Vanga, the maker of ‘Animal’, sparked off a debate on the challenges of filmmaking by claiming it to be tougher than cracking the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) exam. We take a closer look at Sandeep’s defense of his film and the bold comparisons he drew with the highly competitive IAS examination.
A filmmaker’s plea: "Filmmaking is tougher than IAS"
Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s ‘Animal’ recently received sharp criticism from IAS officer Vikas Divyakirti, who deemed the film to be socially regressive and toybox for its portrayal of toxic masculinity. In a fired-up response, Sandeep claimed that filmmaking is far more demanding than preparing for the IAS examination. "I know exactly how much time it takes to prepare for the IAS exam," he stated. "You can pass the exam by dedicating a few years to studying books. But to be a filmmaker and a writer, there’s no course, no teacher that can make you a filmmaker and a writer."
Why filmmaking is challenging beyond compare
Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s spirited defense of his film highlights the various challenges he and his team faced in creating ‘Animal’. The film tackles a complex issue, addressing issues of toxic masculinity, patriarchy, and the objectification of women. Sandeep emphasized the need for personal experience, intuition, and artistic vision in filmmaking, which cannot be replicated through formal education or prolonged study. "There’s no formula, no recipe for making a good film," he emphasized. "It’s about creating something unique, something extraordinary, and that requires a level of trust in one’s vision."
IAS vs. Filmmaking: A comparison that sparks debate
Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s declaration has sparked a lively debate among film enthusiasts, IAS aspirants, and ardent moviegoers alike. His bold assertion has attracted attention, with some countering that cracking the IAS examination requires a tremendous amount of effort, dedication, and expertise. Others have questioned the relevance of the IAS examination in today’s world, citing its perceived biases and controversies.
Conclusion: The ‘Animal’ Controversy and its Impact
Vikas Divyakirti’s sharp criticism of ‘Animal’ has drawn attention to the sensitive, often contentious, subject matter of film criticism. Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s spontaneous response has led to heightened interest in the debate surrounding his film. As the industry continues to grapple with issues of artistic freedom, censorship, and societal responsibility, one thing is clear: the ‘Animal’ controversy will remain a significant talking point in the world of Indian cinema.
Final thoughts: Can a filmmaker’s artistic vision ever be held accountable?
While Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s remarks have set tongues wagging, the question remains: how can a filmmaker’s artistic vision be held accountable for its impact? Is it possible to strike a balance between creative freedom and social responsibility? Should filmmakers be held accountable for the consequences of their work? These questions assume vital significance in the ongoing debate surrounding the legitimacy of artistic expression.
Join the conversation: Share your thoughts on filmmaking, IAS, and artistic responsibility in the comments below!
Live News Daily is a trusted name in the digital news space, delivering accurate, timely, and in-depth reporting on a wide range of topics.