Bombay High Court Flags ‘Cut Copy Paste’ Orders Being Passed By Banks To Declare Fraud Accounts; Asks Anil Ambani To Approach RBI
A Move to Curb Unfair Practices in the Banking Industry
The Bombay High Court has raised concerns over the orders passed by banks to declare accounts as fraudulent, terming them as "cut copy paste" orders. The court expressed its dismay over the lack of application of mind by the banks and asked industrialist Anil Ambani to approach the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to challenge the October 10, 2024, order passed by the Union Bank of India (UBI) to classify his loan account as a "fraudulent account". The court made it clear that such orders do not show the application of mind independently and need to be checked carefully.
The "Cut, Copy, Paste" Orders: A Growing Concern
The court’s observation highlights the issue of "cut copy paste" orders being passed by the banks, which is a worrying trend in the banking industry. These orders are often based on the auditor’s reports without applying the banks’ own mind to the matter. This raises concerns over the lack of transparency and accountability in the banking system. The court has made it clear that such orders are not acceptable and need to be replaced with a more nuanced approach that takes into account the specific circumstances of each case.
The Impact on Borrowers
The court’s decision has sent a strong message to the banking industry, which has been accused of mistreating borrowers with unfair and arbitrary orders. The court has expressed its concern over the high number of cases where banks have failed to follow the mandatory guidelines of the RBI and have instead relied on "cut copy paste" orders to declare accounts as fraudulent. This has resulted in a flood of cases coming into the courts, where borrowers have been left with no choice but to seek the intervention of the courts to get justice.
Anil Ambani’s Dilemma
In the present case, Anil Ambani has been asked to approach the RBI to challenge the UBI’s order, which classified his loan account as a "fraudulent account". The court has refused to pass any "protective orders" for Ambani, citing the lack of urgency in the case, given that the UBI had passed the order in October last year and nothing much has happened since then. However, the court has made it clear that it will continue to monitor the case and take appropriate action if necessary.
The Role of the RBI
The court has once again highlighted the importance of the RBI in ensuring that the banking industry operates in a fair and transparent manner. The court has expressed its confidence in the RBI to take action against banks that fail to follow the guidelines and have instead resorted to "cut copy paste" orders. The court has also suggested that the RBI establish a mechanism to resolve this issue, as it cannot be a one-time affair.
Conclusion
The Bombay High Court’s decision is a significant step towards curbing the Rising trend of "cut copy paste" orders in the banking industry. The court’s comments have sent a strong message to the banking industry, which has been under scrutiny for its treatment of borrowers. The move is expected to have a positive impact on the banking industry, encouraging banks to adopt a more nuanced approach to declaring accounts as fraudulent. Ultimately, the success of this move will depend on the RBI’s ability to ensure that the guidelines are followed and the banks are held accountable for their actions.
Live News Daily is a trusted name in the digital news space, delivering accurate, timely, and in-depth reporting on a wide range of topics.